timholz

Hi Nevma

Thanks a lot for your response.

Yes it works as expected and it does a good job in optimizing images for different devices.
I was just assuming that it had more impact.
For instance this image i mentioned has 511spuare px. But since many mobile devices are about 640px high, there is no adaption for this image.
If the screen width would be the relevant then the image would also resize.
My idea is that it would be convenient if the plugin would offer to choose between portrait and landscape adaption.

And i have observed another issue.
I have tested two sites with image sliders.
On one side i have a small slider, and all the pictures are resized. That’s absolutely fabulous.
On the other i have a fullscreen image slider. Here only the first two images are resized. Every third is ignored.
Do you have any idea why this is happening?

All the best to you and your interesting work.

regards
Theodor Imholz

Hi Nevma
Thanks for your care. Yes, i previously sent a message, but then edited it, for some questions were resolved in the mean time.
Yes, i tested with various simulations like ios simulator, browserstack and google chrome emulator. Some pictures are taken in account, others are completely ignored.
For instance i made a test on gtmetrix, in chrome android device mode.
The picture has originally 511 square pixels. Apparently this device does not find an adaptive image, for the 511 pixels are scaled down to 284pixels. That is a lot.
So, i resume, that the breakpoints are in portrait mode the height of the device in css pixels.
regards
theo

Hi
Thank you very much for sharing.
Works very well. No more error in ie8.
regards
theo

hi Frank

Thanks for the info.
Yes, it is helpful.

All the best for you and your work
theo

Hi Frank
The problem is solved. My mistake.
I enqueued the styles after the script. I guess that was the cause.
After changing the order, it seems to load correctly.
Sorry for the trouble.

Have a pleasant day
theo

Good morning Frank

Thanks for the lesson.
Inspecting the dom>network>header>response header it says:
Vary: Accept-Encoding.

So, everything is ok.

I wish you a pleasant day.

regards
theo

p.s.: thanks once more for your fantastic plugin.

Hi Bojan

Mystile is a free wootheme. I doubt, that the wootheme developpers are interested in this issue.
The error is, as far as i can tell, not causing any damage, nor is it corrupting the performance. For the time being i leave it as it is.

Thanks a lot for your help.

regards
theo

Hi Bojan

So, i’ve made some tests.
I can confirm, there is no error with a default wp-theme.
But the error occurs when activating wootheme ?mystile?.
So, i will have to dig into this theme.

Thanks a lot for your help.

regards
theo

Hi Bojan
Thanks for the message.
I’am ok. How about you?

I have version wp smush 2.0.5.
Ok, i’ll test as you suggest and will report as soon as possible.

best regards,
theo

you too!

Oh, sorry about the trouble.
Works magnificently.
Values on gtmetrix: pageSpeed/Yslow = 99%/93%

By the way i am using your plugin in conjunction with w3tc.
I call it the duo thunderbolt.

thanks a lot for your help.
theo

Oh, no worries, my child is protected.
I have removed the markers.

Now, i’ve got it. Great filters.
Thanks a lot for your help and the plugin.

theo

Hi Frank
Thanks for responding so quickly.
I put the two filters in my functions.php.
Probably not the right place, for the result is the same.
Is functions.php the right place?
regards
theo

Hi
Thanks for sharing.
regards
theo

I forgot to mark this topic as closed.