I happened to read this thread and as it is pretty much about what I’m interested in; I’m going to post my question here.
I have followed the aforementioned guide which means that my wp is installed in public_html/blog and the public html contains index.php (modified) as per:
Change the following and save the file. Change the line that says:
require(‘./wp-blog-header.php’);
to the following, using your directory name for the WordPress core files:
require(‘./wordpress/wp-blog-header.php’);
Public_html also contains a copy of the .htaccess file (copied from the “blog” folder just like it says in the guide). So all it contains is the permlinks stuff…
If I start using bps it will create a new .htaccess file into the “blog” folder. Should I copy the file to public_html or is the one with permlinks rewrites all public_html needs?
The way I see it, bps should be able to do its job without any modifications to the public_html’s htaccess as all there is in public_html besides the htaccess and the “blog” dir is index.php which redirects to “blog” anyway.
In brief, should I copy the bps version to public_html?
Help is much appreciated.
