ziogio98

I tried to add that code in the plugin editor but I had no success.

That’s what I added:

“function sp_content_analysis_content($content, $id) {
//$content = default WP editor
//$id = current post ID
//Example to add your custom field to content analysis
$cf = get_post_meta($id, ‘ct_builder_shortcodes’, true);
$content = $content.$cf;
return $content;
}
add_filter(‘seopress_content_analysis_content’, ‘sp_content_analysis_content’);

So I just replaced my-custom-field with ct_builder_shortcodes. Sometimes the analyzer itself doesn’t work. Other times it works but it says I still have 0 words ecc…

Have I done it correctly?

• This reply was modified 6 years, 3 months ago by ziogio98.

@rhoody i worked with all the layout/page/site builders out there and i own a commercial license with most of them.

I never said Gutenberg will replace them – at all. I love Oxygen 2.0 and Elementor Pro right now and they are millenia ahead of Gutenberg.

But the point is: Gutenberg is a new, enriched, magnified TEXT editor (for now).

And no, I don’t need any shoulder padding. I truly believe Gutenberg is a good TEXT editor. And that’s it.

It allows for more advanced design without using useless plugins, it includes galleries, it allows widgets inside the posts automatically and it has a nice looking design.

And, to be honest, I like changes almost everytime. My idea is not “if it works, keep it that way”. Because that’s not how products evolve.

My idea is “if it doesn’t break everything, let’s try it out”.

I tried it out and, as far as i can see, it doesn’t break anything. I’ve read some bad comments from reputable developers criticizing gutenberg, and I learnt about some bugs they really need to fix before releasing it to the core, but again, this is wp 4.9.8, not 5.0

So let’s try and give them some time. If we won’t like it in wp 5.0, we will just use the classic editor plugin. I don’t see why all the rage is happening.

• This reply was modified 6 years, 3 months ago by ziogio98.
• This reply was modified 6 years, 3 months ago by ziogio98.

These guys are among the best developers in the world, since they are contributing to a future core component of a CMS running 27% of the web.

You probably experienced a bug. I had no problems using it – no blank pages.

@damst i’m sorry if you feel like my comments are BS, but this is an open source product so if i feel a critique is not argumented I think i’m allowed to say that.

@karmatosed three main things right now:

– switching to code mode is a little harder

– the block system is great, but I can’t clearly see and structure the document outline, and the “+” button to add new elements is almost hidden in the corner, while i think it should be the central part of the whole new editor.

– the dropdowns are not always useful. For example, what’s the point of making the “featured image” a dropdown? it’s just one field, let it outside… too much clicks needed right now when compared to the old version.

That’s what feels uncomfortable for me right now. But I’m sure i’ll get used to it. I already love all the other new stuff Gutenber is capable of ??

Nothing becomes complicated, since you have the structure…

Galleries are not a function of the classic editor, and plugins for galleries are slow and bloated. So i’m glad we can have them in Gutenberg.

@nyhetspalatset i think wp developers are more concerned about this than all of us.

I’m pretty sure they know how wp works better than us ??

Activating gutenberg on your website won’t change anything.

Since, you know, it’s just a different UI for the text editor…

Gutenberg is a cool text editor. Not a page builder.

And modern page builders for WP are way more effective than wix and weebly and output clean code.

Gutenberg is not a page builder – not even close.

Page and Site builders are WAY more powerful right now. Gutenberg is simply a rich text editor – that’s it.

The only real difference I can see is in the UI. Nothing more. I really can’t get the two stars…

“We are worried about Woocommerce” – do you truly believe they didn’t think about woocommerce compatibility MONTHS ago?

1) No, it won’t make people sto using wp at all
2) Can you provide an ACTUAL review please?

The UI is a LOT more intuitive than the previous one. You’re just used to the classic editor.

Give more than 24 hours lol.

• This reply was modified 6 years, 3 months ago by ziogio98.

It stores content in a custom field, as far as i know.

It’s not a big deal since I can just write inside wordpress and style how content is displayed with oxygen, but it would be nice to have the integration with visual builders ??

The only one fully working is Yoast SEO, so i think it would be great for sales as well ??

• This reply was modified 6 years, 4 months ago by ziogio98.

I’ve read through around 30 negative comments. Still no one explaining WHAT they don’t like about Gutenberg. That’s simply non sense.

“I don’t like it” is seriously all you can say about it?

And how “If WP Team ever try to put it in the core, I’ll give up WP altogether” can be a threath? WP does not make money out of your use of their core product.

So you preferred tinymce? Why?

Page builders are disliked for the bad cose output (which not all of them create), but they’re simply how frontend editing should feel and look.

Code purists will never agree on this, but custom html + css is slow, costly and intensive. So I cheer to every page builder (not visual composer, i hate it too).

That being said, Gutenberg is not a page builder.